Curiosity and clarification
Nov. 27th, 2005 08:50 pmI'm kind of curious, and this seems a reasonable place to ask. I know a lot of people who talk about chosen family (or clan, or whatever), either in addition to or instead of the more traditional biological family. Sometimes it's in relation to poly, but not necessarily by any means.
If you describe yourself as having chosen family, how do you choose that family? What defines, for you, family as opposed to friends? Is the boundary fluid? Do you ever have people who are friends eventually come to feel like family, or do you drift away from people and eventually count them as friends instead? Are family relationships necessarily more intimate? Are you more likely to try and build a relationship with someone based on the fact that they are involved with someone you consider family, or a friend, or does that make any difference at all? I've recently seen it described as a distinction that's easier for someone from a close knit, loving family to make than someone who wasn't, based on what it feels like - does this describe what most of you have observed? Does it make a difference to you if someone you consider family doesn't consider you so, doesn't choose you back?
It's a far more complicated concept than the standard biological family where the relationship is clearly defined - you are born with a standard set of relations, and expected to evolve emotional attachments to match. My own family is definitely not close, and I do tend to feel that I have people who are chosen family, but recent conversations and observations have made me think about it a little more. Somewhat like poly, it's not a simple thing, and means many things to many people. It's also prone to assumptions people may not even realize they're making, or at least so I find, so I'm curious what other people may come up with if I get you all thinking about it too!
If you describe yourself as having chosen family, how do you choose that family? What defines, for you, family as opposed to friends? Is the boundary fluid? Do you ever have people who are friends eventually come to feel like family, or do you drift away from people and eventually count them as friends instead? Are family relationships necessarily more intimate? Are you more likely to try and build a relationship with someone based on the fact that they are involved with someone you consider family, or a friend, or does that make any difference at all? I've recently seen it described as a distinction that's easier for someone from a close knit, loving family to make than someone who wasn't, based on what it feels like - does this describe what most of you have observed? Does it make a difference to you if someone you consider family doesn't consider you so, doesn't choose you back?
It's a far more complicated concept than the standard biological family where the relationship is clearly defined - you are born with a standard set of relations, and expected to evolve emotional attachments to match. My own family is definitely not close, and I do tend to feel that I have people who are chosen family, but recent conversations and observations have made me think about it a little more. Somewhat like poly, it's not a simple thing, and means many things to many people. It's also prone to assumptions people may not even realize they're making, or at least so I find, so I'm curious what other people may come up with if I get you all thinking about it too!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:00 am (UTC)Autographed Doc. A Van Halen lyric (Sometimes the simple life ain't so simple) reminds me that even
traditional marriage / family can have its complications - death / divorce, remarriage, half-siblings,
fosterage, adoption.
Ann O. (thankful for whichever)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 09:07 am (UTC)Chosen family are, for me, the people who step into family roles when we need them. These relationships don't have to be sexual, and that's not the line I'd use to define them, because sex is not something I think of as necessarily relationship-deepening. (Often, in my experience anyway, sex stops relationships deepening right there and the relationship becomes all about sex. Not always, though.) Just because someone has had sex with me doesn't mean they're part of my family. Of course, I tend to have sex only with people who have the potential to be part of that group these days, so the point might be a little blurry.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 10:36 am (UTC)It's definitely a feeling - and one that I actually have about some friends, which I *don't* about certain members of my blood family.
Best example is probably Teddy and Tom Nanson. I've bound them as tightly to us as I can, both emotionally and legally (they are the legal guardians of our children, should anything happen to us, and also Godparents to both), but the relationship goes beyond that. It's a certain kind of *ease* around them. I don't care if I throw up in front of them, as I know Tom would hold my hair out of the way whilst Teddy rubbed my back. Had timings been less rushed, they would have been at Ellie's birth, and you don't get less dignified than that.
I know that I don't have to worry about doing or saying something unforgiveable - they could forgive me anything, and I would do the same in return. I think that's probably the crux of it for me - I can be myself totally and completely. Family don't need masks. Family don't care when you say something catty or bitchy. Family love you unconditionally, whatever you do or say. Family are always prepared to hear the word, "Sorry".
There are very few people who I'd lay down my life for. Teddy, Tom, Bill and Brenda are definitely on my "Want a kidney? Here you go!" list.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 10:21 pm (UTC)